after the paris agreement will world leaders be able to slow down global warming?Bill Bowkett investigates
Global warming has changed the climate dramatically. Increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide produced by fossil fuels in automobiles and factories, have bumped up temperatures. For many, this is becoming an increasing concern. Global warming can lead to natural disasters, animal extinction, draughts and the melting of the ice cap.
In December 2015 nearly 200 world leaders, including UK delegates, came together in the French capital of Paris to discuss tackling climate change and lowering our carbon footprint. They agreed to keep average global temperature increase "well below" 2°C with a new target of 1.5°C. Leaders also agreed to reduce harmful greenhouse gases and increase renewables including wind, solar and wave power. This deal is now in full force now in 2016. But has it worked?
The UK has a track record in combating climate change. In 2004, Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm opened on the Norfolk coast and it now powers most homes in Norfolk. Even during the tough economic and political times of the 21st century, Global warming is still the biggest issues that politicians face.
Although US President Barack Obama said that this deal offered "the best chance we have" to save the planet, it has still been very much opened to criticism.
Leaders agreed to spend $100 billion dollars a year in climate finance for poorer countries by 2020 with a commitment to further finance in the future. However, Western nations like the UK and the US disagree with about funding for LEDCs (Less Economically Developed Countries). However, some argue that the aims are too unrealistic and difficult. Despite countries putting millions into new forms of renewable energy, it is not happening fast enough. In addition, these new renewable sources are costing countries millions or billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money.
Would it be more worthwhile to find more long-term solutions? Or what about education for students and parents about reducing their carbon footprint? It is small things, like turning off your sockets when not in use or cycling rather than driving that could be more effective ways to save the planet.
For now, we need to see what effort is going to made by the 195 nations. The US Election has brought unsustainability with this issue. Clinton has not mentioned the environment in her campaign and Donald Trump has hinted at cancelling the contract, and calling climate change a “hoax.”
What will be important is, however, is how this deal will work in the future and that some attention will need to be done from all nations to preserve our planet.